Skip to main content

No leapfrogging: Africa's digital reality

On Monday I was privileged enough to present a keynote at the SATNAC conference in South Africa, the slides for which can be found here.

The presentation is a little less conceptual than my usual... in that there are significantly fewer pictures of cats off the internet. The thrust of my argument was as follows:

Part 1 - setup

  • We are in the early throes of a shift to a new economic system
  • This means redefinition of the roles of individuals in society, businesses and governments in their lives
  • Conceptually, some commentators believe that this new system will enable African countries to leapfrog over their developed world counterparts because they don't have the infrastructure, business model and cultural encumbrances of the Industrial Economy
  • To examine whether that is true, we need to look at the ingredients for success at a macro (national or perhaps mega-corp level), which I'd describe as:
  • Pervasive access to computing (because this is the general purpose technology of the era)
  • Symmetry of information (to enable the maximum benefit of that technology and empower people)
  • An innovation and entrepreneurial culture (that seeks to monetise as well as create new ideas)
  • Digital skills and education (providing everyone with the capabilities they need to thrive personally and professionally in a new world)
Part 2 - Access (this was a technology conference, after all)
  • Computing power is cloud-based and there's an effectively infinite amount of it available as long as you have connectivity, so there's no need to worry about that
  • Access to computing is the key and this is made up of four elements: device proliferation, efficient organisations to make services suitable for consumers, core network capacity and international connectivity 
  • Consumers in Africa have huge desire for phones, but smartphone penetration is still extremely low
  • $90Bn has been spent on upgrading African telecoms infrastructure over the last 5 years, which is a huge number in absolute terms...
  • ...but when you look at it relative to the rest of the world, you see that only a handful of countries are at the average level of investment in infrastructure per capita
  • Given that most African countries are starting from a position of scarce coverage and depth of communications, this means that despite the investment they are slipping further behind
  • More than $30Bn of M&A has also happened in the last 5 years, but this has no consistent positive or negative impact on investment
  • The final part of the mix, inter-network connectivity is particularly bad - more than half of African countries have no Internet Exchange Point (IXP), making peering between providers prohibitively expensive
  • In short, there is consumer demand for services, although not internet ones, network infrastructure is lagging and interconnectivity is even more lagging
Part 3 - culture
  • Being a digital economy is about way more than just having decent connectivity (something that many legislators fail to appreciate)
  • Culture is at least as important. In my view this is a function of having problems to solve; the ability to take risk; access to resources and appropriate regulation
  • Taking them one-by-one, there are plenty of startups in Africa but they tend to be dealing with local problems caused by lack of infrastructure rather than those with international relevance. MPESA's patchy success outside of Kenya is illustrative
  • Culturally though, Africans seem more than typically willing to take risks and want to set up their own business (the exception being in South Africa, which has disastrously poor incentives for entrepreneurial behaviour)
  • Lack of availability of capital and other production resources is a serious impediment...
  • And the developed market solution of online ways of matching supply and demand are basically unavailable
  • An important thing to know is that success in digital products and services is a numbers game - you can't just have one crowdfunding platform and hope for it to succeed - you likely need to have dozens and let natural selection take its course
  • Finally, the role of government in this needs to be to educate people in the real skills they need, rather than interfering in telecoms!
Conclusion
  1. There is no evidence of a leap frog in progress
  2. Infrastructure may be wireless and broadband-first in a way that it isn't elsewhere, but there's nowhere near enough of it to make any African country a South Korea and the possibility of that scenario emerging is actually receding
  3. For all of the fibre being dug in, there are more basic needs - IXPs being a first thing, a supply of cheaper smartphone handsets a second one
  4. The digital innovation that is taking place in African countries is solving national problems. It is using tools that are not relevant outside Africa (feature phones) to solve problems that are often irrelevant as well. This is not a criticism of that activity: it will certainly help countries over their infrastructure gaps, it just isn't likely to be a source of FDI
  5. Governments need to focus on getting the skills basics right in their countries. This may be a way of starting an actual leap forward as the skills of the new economy are not widely available in the developed markets so making them basic in African countries could gain advantage over the long term
I'm aware that this might be a somewhat controversial point of view. However much I wanted to be able to make a positive case, I'm afraid that the future currently looks like slipping further behind in relative terms and becoming a less attractive place to invest. One of those times when I hope I'm wrong.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Impacts of a handset leasing model on mobile telcos

Following yesterday's post, here's some related thinking on the impacts on operators of handset leasing. Handset sales represent around 25% of operator revenues in a typical European market, but generate only around 5% of margin. It may therefore be the case that the scenario described would lead operators to a more profitable structural model than exists today. Oil companies are consistently and acceptably profitable, despite being (literally in some cases) the ‘dumb pipe’ that operators are so desperate to avoid becoming. One of the reasons for the oil majors sustained profitability is clear focus on their role in the value chain – to supply the fuel that enables transportation, relying primarily on location, then brand and finally product innovation to compete. BP or Shell do not need to subsidise the purchase of a car in order to drive consumption of fuel because consumers are ‘hooked’ on it (it gets them from place to place) and there are many credible car manufacturers an

Value drivers for telecoms retail

I've been doing a really large number of driver trees recently - we've taken to using them on every project to get really into the guts of value creation for businesses and thus decide where to focus initiative development (How To Win, if you're keeping score). Anyhow, I had to pause for thought recently to work out how to represent the subscription aspect of telecoms retail for a client. Since it took me a minute, I thought I'd share... its lack of elegance suggests that its not quite right, although it was enough to demonstrate that there was a certain lack of coverage in the initiatives that my client was pursuing and thus spark a debate. Enjoy.

Chief Strategy Officers II - Career Development

Here's a follow up to my earlier post on the starting point of Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) careers in the FTSE 100 and S&P 500 companies - a visualisation of two steps in their careers: their first employer or job and the job they had before they got their current position. Lots of work went into this... so any insights that you glean from the visualisation would be great to hear about :). The CSO is a crucial strategic role on the executive (!) and the owner of the tone and philosophy of decision making across much of the business, knowingly or unknowingly. Scrutiny of their experience in defining the process and language of strategic management is therefore appropriate not just amongst their executive peers, but in my view amongst shareholders. The days when being very smart and able to analyse large amounts of data were enough to be a CSO are basically gone... has the profession moved on enough to cope?