Skip to main content

Nokia finally gets itself in the shop window

Besides a slight naming problem, there were few surprises in the launch of the Lumia 800 at Nokia World today. I was a bit unimpressed by the stage show, which felt very forced, but the hardware looks good and, according to early benchmarks it offers very respectible performance. A few thoughts from me:

I think Nokia should have been more aggressive in its pricing. I'm firmly of the belief that the mass market smartphone customer makes a simple choice. If they can afford an iPhone, then they buy one - its a trusted choice in a rather confusing world, not to mention its status symbol er... status. Those who can't afford iPhone then choose a monthly payment they can afford and go from there. By pricing the 800 at the same point as iPhone, I think NOK are in for an uphill battle. Rebuilding their brand requires shifting a lot of units and becoming the "next best option" after iPhone; not going head to head with Apple just yet. If it was me, I'd have accepted much lower margins in order to make that position easy, at least until the brand can carry the fight again.

The US story is more of the same - hurry up and wait. I noticed that Mr Elop said they'd be launching a portfolio of devices early next year. Presumeably Lumia is part of that and presumeably the lack of CDMA or LTE support at launch means the operator partner will be AT&T and/ or T-Mobile.

Going on the NOK website shows that the UK launch partners will be Vodafone and 3. I've found it hard to locate a place where I can preorder SIM-free, but will persevere so I can get hold of one ASAP.

Navigation features yet again, representative of the restructure of NOK to put Navteq closer to the core of the business. Nokia adocates will doubtless point out that equivalent navigation facilities cost $100 on the iPhone. I personally doubt that this will be a major selling point in developed markets, given that data allowances are relatively generous for mainstream consumers.

For me, the critical launch today was of the Asha range of semi-smart devices, priced sub-$100. I'm very bullish about the sub-$100 smartphone market in general as it offers a logical upgrade path for the 70Mn consumers joining the middle class every year for the next decade. It's therefore a critical thing for Nokia to get right. I worry that Asha is not smart enough to offer a genuine competitor to Huawei's IDEOS range and equivalents from ZTE. But time will tell.

I'll get my hands on the device and hopefully post again... hopefully using it!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Impacts of a handset leasing model on mobile telcos

Following yesterday's post, here's some related thinking on the impacts on operators of handset leasing. Handset sales represent around 25% of operator revenues in a typical European market, but generate only around 5% of margin. It may therefore be the case that the scenario described would lead operators to a more profitable structural model than exists today. Oil companies are consistently and acceptably profitable, despite being (literally in some cases) the ‘dumb pipe’ that operators are so desperate to avoid becoming. One of the reasons for the oil majors sustained profitability is clear focus on their role in the value chain – to supply the fuel that enables transportation, relying primarily on location, then brand and finally product innovation to compete. BP or Shell do not need to subsidise the purchase of a car in order to drive consumption of fuel because consumers are ‘hooked’ on it (it gets them from place to place) and there are many credible car manufacturers an

Value drivers for telecoms retail

I've been doing a really large number of driver trees recently - we've taken to using them on every project to get really into the guts of value creation for businesses and thus decide where to focus initiative development (How To Win, if you're keeping score). Anyhow, I had to pause for thought recently to work out how to represent the subscription aspect of telecoms retail for a client. Since it took me a minute, I thought I'd share... its lack of elegance suggests that its not quite right, although it was enough to demonstrate that there was a certain lack of coverage in the initiatives that my client was pursuing and thus spark a debate. Enjoy.

Chief Strategy Officers II - Career Development

Here's a follow up to my earlier post on the starting point of Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) careers in the FTSE 100 and S&P 500 companies - a visualisation of two steps in their careers: their first employer or job and the job they had before they got their current position. Lots of work went into this... so any insights that you glean from the visualisation would be great to hear about :). The CSO is a crucial strategic role on the executive (!) and the owner of the tone and philosophy of decision making across much of the business, knowingly or unknowingly. Scrutiny of their experience in defining the process and language of strategic management is therefore appropriate not just amongst their executive peers, but in my view amongst shareholders. The days when being very smart and able to analyse large amounts of data were enough to be a CSO are basically gone... has the profession moved on enough to cope?