Skip to main content

The (brief) tale of Myspace's dog

"1 in 4 Americans is on MySpace, in the UK it’s as common to have a MySpace as it is to own a dog" was the wonderfully obscure quote that accompanied the social network's 2008 annual report. Myspace's subsequent decline is well known, but curiously when I was asked for a summary of social network membership I struggled to find a single source.

To that end, here's my assessment of the current and historic state of three social networks: Facebook, Twitter and Myspace.
This clearly shows how Twitter has accelerated customer acquisition in the last year. Arguably I've been conservative with my 2013 forecast too - growth could well inflect again considering the amount of positive press the service gets and its extreme compatibility with mobile usage.

Part of that popularity is driven by celebrity stalking. The next chart shows the most popular Twitter celebs. Note that Stephen Fry - often cited as the archetypal celebrity tweeter - is in fact a shrinking violet of the scene. Lady Gaga has the followship of 6.3 Fries. A weighty achievement.
Doing the same analysis for Facebook demonstrates the difference in demographics between the two platforms. The number one celebrity fan page on Facebook: Eminem. Rihanna is #2, demonstrating just how much we love the way they lie.

Sorry. I couldn't resist!

Comments

  1. Your MySpace forecast for 2013 seems to show a bit of growth - any reason for this?

    What I find interesting is that the biggest US stars have just over five times the followers of the biggest UK stars. The US population is just over five times that of the UK. On first look, you would think that this is to be expected - but the US stars pride themselves on being worldwide names, which you'd therefore expect to have proportionally higher follower counts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My view on myspace is that the size of their music catalogue and the (smart) move of linking themselves to Facebook and Twitter will drive a gradual improvement in their subscriber numbers. Question is whether they will get better engagement because of it - the original trouble they had in my view was that they had far too many dud accounts. I recall when they hit 100Mn accounts that there was analysis to suggest that only about 40% logged in at least weekly.

      Good point on the US/ UK population, although the US online population is proportionally smaller than the UK's. OECD suggests that the ratio of online populations is 3.5:1 in the US' favour. I probably need to correct for that...

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Impacts of a handset leasing model on mobile telcos

Following yesterday's post, here's some related thinking on the impacts on operators of handset leasing. Handset sales represent around 25% of operator revenues in a typical European market, but generate only around 5% of margin. It may therefore be the case that the scenario described would lead operators to a more profitable structural model than exists today. Oil companies are consistently and acceptably profitable, despite being (literally in some cases) the ‘dumb pipe’ that operators are so desperate to avoid becoming. One of the reasons for the oil majors sustained profitability is clear focus on their role in the value chain – to supply the fuel that enables transportation, relying primarily on location, then brand and finally product innovation to compete. BP or Shell do not need to subsidise the purchase of a car in order to drive consumption of fuel because consumers are ‘hooked’ on it (it gets them from place to place) and there are many credible car manufacturers an

Value drivers for telecoms retail

I've been doing a really large number of driver trees recently - we've taken to using them on every project to get really into the guts of value creation for businesses and thus decide where to focus initiative development (How To Win, if you're keeping score). Anyhow, I had to pause for thought recently to work out how to represent the subscription aspect of telecoms retail for a client. Since it took me a minute, I thought I'd share... its lack of elegance suggests that its not quite right, although it was enough to demonstrate that there was a certain lack of coverage in the initiatives that my client was pursuing and thus spark a debate. Enjoy.

Chief Strategy Officers II - Career Development

Here's a follow up to my earlier post on the starting point of Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) careers in the FTSE 100 and S&P 500 companies - a visualisation of two steps in their careers: their first employer or job and the job they had before they got their current position. Lots of work went into this... so any insights that you glean from the visualisation would be great to hear about :). The CSO is a crucial strategic role on the executive (!) and the owner of the tone and philosophy of decision making across much of the business, knowingly or unknowingly. Scrutiny of their experience in defining the process and language of strategic management is therefore appropriate not just amongst their executive peers, but in my view amongst shareholders. The days when being very smart and able to analyse large amounts of data were enough to be a CSO are basically gone... has the profession moved on enough to cope?