Skip to main content

The eight traits of a digital business

I'm using the lull between Christmas and New Year to gather my thoughts from 2014. It's been a crazy year: it feels like digital has finally hit the boardroom agenda in a more fundamental way than a technology or marketing investment. 'Early adopter' leaders understand that there are radical productivity and competitive advantages to adopting a digital culture and are thinking how to create one.

That's not to say that I haven't seen a large number of executives and boards who want to brand a vanilla technology or go-to-market tweak as a radical digital initiative. It may surprise you to know that I have no issue with the latter approach to growth - I'm not a zealot and frankly many organisations do not yet face an existential crisis caused by the digital economy. Still more simply don't have the operating platform (capital, cultural, technological) in place to make any sort of radical change. The trouble is that if you brand something as a fundamental change then people will expect one. It's better (in my view) to be honest and say that now isn't the time for radicalism and reserve the opportunity to make the major change later.

Anyhow, one of the most subjects I talk about with organisations is what a digital business looks and feels like. Inspired by a colleague who came up with his own 'traits of a digital business', I've jotted down eight themes. I'd be interested in any of your views on how these are framed...


  1. Think exponential: dedicate resources to finding 10x ways to enhance productivity. Accept that some of these ideas will fail and embrace the lessons from them.
  2. Acquire digital capabilities: Combine new skills with the best existing talent to create digital teams that demonstrate the practices that the organisation is trying to achieve in the long term.
  3. Execute lean: learn to do everything in short sprints, from radical innovation to mundane processing. Empower team to enhance, pivot and kill tasks.
  4. Emphasise communications: select and incentivise leaders to understand, embody and promote the digital change. Create structures to actively engage everyone with digital working practices. 
  5. Put people first: always think about what outcomes people need and want first, not about existing processes, products and services. Your own people are as important as your customers.
  6. Use new ideas to solve old issues: look for new ideas to solve old issues. Don't be blinded by the status quo. Don't be deceived by the Tyranny of the Business Case.
  7. Design work as well as Design Thinking: design is the differentiator in digital, but most important is the combination of talents that deliver it. Remember to focus machines on the systematic, humans on the empathetic.
  8. Focus on value: don't get distracted by beautiful design or shiny technology: focus on value for shareholders and understand that people need real incentives to change.
That's where I am right now. One thing I definitely need to get in there is the value of generalists over specialists. I worry that many people associate winning in digital with the acquisition of deep, narrow specialists such as data scientists, coders and creatives. Those are all important, but the real niche skill that's required is the broadest - super-smart, inquisitive and creative generalists who bind things together, keep things focused on value and ultimately lead projects to completion. There are remarkably few people like this. Finding and developing some more is just one of my challenges in 2015.

Hope that was interesting!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Impacts of a handset leasing model on mobile telcos

Following yesterday's post, here's some related thinking on the impacts on operators of handset leasing. Handset sales represent around 25% of operator revenues in a typical European market, but generate only around 5% of margin. It may therefore be the case that the scenario described would lead operators to a more profitable structural model than exists today. Oil companies are consistently and acceptably profitable, despite being (literally in some cases) the ‘dumb pipe’ that operators are so desperate to avoid becoming. One of the reasons for the oil majors sustained profitability is clear focus on their role in the value chain – to supply the fuel that enables transportation, relying primarily on location, then brand and finally product innovation to compete. BP or Shell do not need to subsidise the purchase of a car in order to drive consumption of fuel because consumers are ‘hooked’ on it (it gets them from place to place) and there are many credible car manufacturers an

Value drivers for telecoms retail

I've been doing a really large number of driver trees recently - we've taken to using them on every project to get really into the guts of value creation for businesses and thus decide where to focus initiative development (How To Win, if you're keeping score). Anyhow, I had to pause for thought recently to work out how to represent the subscription aspect of telecoms retail for a client. Since it took me a minute, I thought I'd share... its lack of elegance suggests that its not quite right, although it was enough to demonstrate that there was a certain lack of coverage in the initiatives that my client was pursuing and thus spark a debate. Enjoy.

Chief Strategy Officers II - Career Development

Here's a follow up to my earlier post on the starting point of Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) careers in the FTSE 100 and S&P 500 companies - a visualisation of two steps in their careers: their first employer or job and the job they had before they got their current position. Lots of work went into this... so any insights that you glean from the visualisation would be great to hear about :). The CSO is a crucial strategic role on the executive (!) and the owner of the tone and philosophy of decision making across much of the business, knowingly or unknowingly. Scrutiny of their experience in defining the process and language of strategic management is therefore appropriate not just amongst their executive peers, but in my view amongst shareholders. The days when being very smart and able to analyse large amounts of data were enough to be a CSO are basically gone... has the profession moved on enough to cope?