Skip to main content

Bikes?? What the £&@# are you doing, Ford?

Ford is one of the many auto companies creating innovation centres that develop digital experiences around what are very industrial economy (and very disrupted products). They have three and their stand at Mobile World Congress showcased some of the fruits of their endeavours.

Most conventional is an all electric Ford Focus that can sync with a mobile app, which gives the user a modicum of personalisation over the vehicle. You've seen it before. Ford's isn't the best. It isn't the worst. Blah.

Then there's an electric bicycle designed with Dahon. This is supposed to be a range extension product that enables commuters to make a choice of methods of commuting based on traffic conditions, weather, lifestyle etc... There's a pointless app for the cycles lights, turn signals etc... Clearly none of them have ever ridden a bike as poking at tiny buttons while in the saddle is a bit of a dangerous idea!

Finally and most interesting is a project being run out of their Palo Alto centre that measures the routes that cyclists take through cities as well as the prevailing weather conditions. The idea is to add that mapping data to navigation systems in order to enable people to make better choices about their mode of transport. I also suggested that it would be useful contextual data to feed into self-driving vehicles so that they know to leave extra room for cyclists on days when there are likely to be a lot of people commuting that way, but be less attentive on rainy days. I was met with a blank look, so maybe not!

In general I had a really nice time at Ford. The people were lovely. But I also asked several times why they were doing this. And no one seemed to know. Strava and Garmin know far more about cycle routes than Ford can with their little experiment. Weather data is available very freely. Mash them up for an MVP. Very few people are likely to choose their commuter bike based on the model of car they have... Unless they have a Lotus, perhaps. And so it goes on... 

This is a classic case of an idea in the lab not working in the real world because the people who would buy it don't actually make the choices that the developer thinks. Ford would have done well to actually think about commercial value and use cases before diving in and engineering clever telematics and stupid apps. Then they could have used a Lean Startup method to try it out for real. Not as glitzy but so much better!

Value hypothesis first, Ford. Henry wouldn't have been happy.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Impacts of a handset leasing model on mobile telcos

Following yesterday's post, here's some related thinking on the impacts on operators of handset leasing. Handset sales represent around 25% of operator revenues in a typical European market, but generate only around 5% of margin. It may therefore be the case that the scenario described would lead operators to a more profitable structural model than exists today. Oil companies are consistently and acceptably profitable, despite being (literally in some cases) the ‘dumb pipe’ that operators are so desperate to avoid becoming. One of the reasons for the oil majors sustained profitability is clear focus on their role in the value chain – to supply the fuel that enables transportation, relying primarily on location, then brand and finally product innovation to compete. BP or Shell do not need to subsidise the purchase of a car in order to drive consumption of fuel because consumers are ‘hooked’ on it (it gets them from place to place) and there are many credible car manufacturers an
9 comments
Read more

Value drivers for telecoms retail

I've been doing a really large number of driver trees recently - we've taken to using them on every project to get really into the guts of value creation for businesses and thus decide where to focus initiative development (How To Win, if you're keeping score). Anyhow, I had to pause for thought recently to work out how to represent the subscription aspect of telecoms retail for a client. Since it took me a minute, I thought I'd share... its lack of elegance suggests that its not quite right, although it was enough to demonstrate that there was a certain lack of coverage in the initiatives that my client was pursuing and thus spark a debate. Enjoy.
1 comment
Read more

Chief Strategy Officers II - Career Development

Here's a follow up to my earlier post on the starting point of Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) careers in the FTSE 100 and S&P 500 companies - a visualisation of two steps in their careers: their first employer or job and the job they had before they got their current position. Lots of work went into this... so any insights that you glean from the visualisation would be great to hear about :). The CSO is a crucial strategic role on the executive (!) and the owner of the tone and philosophy of decision making across much of the business, knowingly or unknowingly. Scrutiny of their experience in defining the process and language of strategic management is therefore appropriate not just amongst their executive peers, but in my view amongst shareholders. The days when being very smart and able to analyse large amounts of data were enough to be a CSO are basically gone... has the profession moved on enough to cope?
4 comments
Read more