Skip to main content

The quantified marathon, part 1

Wearables are one of the tech' trends of 2014, with the launch of Glass upon us and continued interest in life-logging activity bands. I've been messing around with this tech since early 2012, when I was one of the first UK buyers of the Nike FuelBand. That device had it's flaws, but certainly demonstrated the potential for gamifying the lifestyles of everyday consumers.

More recently, I've switched to a second generation device, Jawbone's Up. It's lighter, more comfortable and has better software than the Nike effort, although it lacks wireless connectivity. The second recent development is me training for the London marathon, which gives me the chance to try out the Up in a pretty in depth way.

6 weeks and 220km in, here are some early takeaways:


  1. It's more accurate than you'd think: +/- 5% or better in terms of distance travelled...
  2. ...but it has it's flaws: the lack of waterproofing is annoying for my swimming training (I'm doing triathlons as well as the marathon). It also has a habit of picking up mundane activities like typing as walking!
  3. Measurement exposes the dangers of our lifestyles: I've had to drive to a couple of off site meetings in the last couple of months. On those days, my basic activity level, which I try to keep to the recommended 10,000 steps, fell below 4,000. Urbanites like myself just naturally have active lifestyles, making persistent monitoring less valuable. Anyone who drives isn't so lucky - knowing how inactive you are might make you "top up" in the gym or make changes. Here's hoping.
    As an aside, I average about 18,000 steps a day. During my (luxurious) 3 week Christmas holiday, that jumped up to over 25,000, demonstrating the health value of a better work/ life balance!
  4. Social + life logging is an invasive experience... and it takes some getting used to! I have a couple of friends on UP's platform and to be frank it's a bit strange knowing when they sleep and how well, where they exercise and how much. One of them records his meals, so I know that information too. I'm not too fussed by it, but I could see that being a bit too revealing for many people.

So that's the upshot of about 3 months of UP and 6 weeks of marathon training. I'll be putting in another 200km in the next 4 weeks... then I'll do Part 2! Wish me luck!

Finally, as you'll know from my social media bombing, I'm running the marathon for the NSPCC - a brilliant charity that continues to fight child poverty, neglect and cruelty in the UK. Any donations would be greatly appreciated!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Impacts of a handset leasing model on mobile telcos

Following yesterday's post, here's some related thinking on the impacts on operators of handset leasing. Handset sales represent around 25% of operator revenues in a typical European market, but generate only around 5% of margin. It may therefore be the case that the scenario described would lead operators to a more profitable structural model than exists today. Oil companies are consistently and acceptably profitable, despite being (literally in some cases) the ‘dumb pipe’ that operators are so desperate to avoid becoming. One of the reasons for the oil majors sustained profitability is clear focus on their role in the value chain – to supply the fuel that enables transportation, relying primarily on location, then brand and finally product innovation to compete. BP or Shell do not need to subsidise the purchase of a car in order to drive consumption of fuel because consumers are ‘hooked’ on it (it gets them from place to place) and there are many credible car manufacturers an

Value drivers for telecoms retail

I've been doing a really large number of driver trees recently - we've taken to using them on every project to get really into the guts of value creation for businesses and thus decide where to focus initiative development (How To Win, if you're keeping score). Anyhow, I had to pause for thought recently to work out how to represent the subscription aspect of telecoms retail for a client. Since it took me a minute, I thought I'd share... its lack of elegance suggests that its not quite right, although it was enough to demonstrate that there was a certain lack of coverage in the initiatives that my client was pursuing and thus spark a debate. Enjoy.

Chief Strategy Officers II - Career Development

Here's a follow up to my earlier post on the starting point of Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) careers in the FTSE 100 and S&P 500 companies - a visualisation of two steps in their careers: their first employer or job and the job they had before they got their current position. Lots of work went into this... so any insights that you glean from the visualisation would be great to hear about :). The CSO is a crucial strategic role on the executive (!) and the owner of the tone and philosophy of decision making across much of the business, knowingly or unknowingly. Scrutiny of their experience in defining the process and language of strategic management is therefore appropriate not just amongst their executive peers, but in my view amongst shareholders. The days when being very smart and able to analyse large amounts of data were enough to be a CSO are basically gone... has the profession moved on enough to cope?