Skip to main content

Media Democracy B-Side - cord cutting

My latest State of the Media Democracy B-Side covers an emotive and controversial issue – that of cord cutting. For those of you not familiar with the term, cord cutting refers to customers cancelling their pay-TV subscriptions and replacing them with free or paid-for on-demand services.

As the chart below shows, the proportion of respondents subscribing to pay-TV services actually went up in all markets in 2011. This is despite the fact that in 2010 a relatively large number of respondents (about a quarter in France and Japan) said that they were intending to dispense with their subscriptions in favour of free or paid-for streamed alternatives.
So why didn’t they? The answer is two-fold, I think. Firstly the number of people with the equipment to actually cut the cord is fairly limited as a proportion of the total. Most consumers with connected-ready TVs and Blu-ray players haven’t actually connected them because they lack the requisite (and expensive) Wi-fi dongle and the TV is too far from their Internet router. Those with connected consoles are more likely to use them for gaming than TV streaming. The second, and more important, reason is that the online products that exist today just aren’t as good as their broadcast equivalents. IP isn’t an efficient way of delivering high-reliability, high-definition pictures. “Best endeavours” is fine for overall resilience of the pipe, but not for broadcast quality delivery.Furthermore, although streamed movie services are good for... movies... they don’t offer the “on the day of release” high concept programming and entertainment content that audiences love or access to premium sports, exclusive access to which costs far more cash than the online services can afford.

Truth be told, movies are a small part of the home entertainment ecosystem. Streaming is a (potential) substitute for DVD through the post, which was a substitute for physical rental. Not TV.Globally, subscription VOD and DVD by mail both grew – they are content extenders and may replace some DVD purchasing and movie channels. They cost much the same as the latter though, so are easily defended by the Pay TV industry through services like Sky Anytime+ that offer on-demand movies alongside broadcast.Finally, it’s worth noting that the major reason people watch TV is the social experience. TV is the media type that respondents in all markets talked about most regularly at the watercooler, on the living room sofa and over social networks. If you cut the cord and let the audience decide what to watch, then you’d lose all that. So I don’t think they’ll be cutting it all that soon.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Differences between Industrial and Digital businesses

Since I'm stuck on a Eurostar crawling through western France I thought I'd use the downtime to share this table I've made on the differences between Industrial and Digital companies across the main business functions. A strange insight into how my mind works... but hopeful a useful summary!

Strategic lessons from Debenhams

Yesterday’s news cycle brought with it the announcement that Debenhams, a staple of the UK high street, was now in the control of its lenders . This kind of news is sad for the employees of Debenhams and certainly for its shareholders, but it is also a good opportunity for reflection. A business that can trace its history back to 1778 may be about to cease trading forever. For leaders in the retail and associated consumer industries, now is a good time to consider what lessons can be learnt from Debenhams and what could be done to seize the opportunity presented by its passing. I’m thinking about the topic of strategic responses to emerging events at the moment because of the seeming inevitability of a recession this year or next, which will doubtless bring with it many similar situations. Before I get started, a disclaimer. I have no inside knowledge of Debenhams, I have never consulted for them, pitched to them or even met anyone in their management team. This post uses Debenham...

Impacts of a handset leasing model on mobile telcos

Following yesterday's post, here's some related thinking on the impacts on operators of handset leasing. Handset sales represent around 25% of operator revenues in a typical European market, but generate only around 5% of margin. It may therefore be the case that the scenario described would lead operators to a more profitable structural model than exists today. Oil companies are consistently and acceptably profitable, despite being (literally in some cases) the ‘dumb pipe’ that operators are so desperate to avoid becoming. One of the reasons for the oil majors sustained profitability is clear focus on their role in the value chain – to supply the fuel that enables transportation, relying primarily on location, then brand and finally product innovation to compete. BP or Shell do not need to subsidise the purchase of a car in order to drive consumption of fuel because consumers are ‘hooked’ on it (it gets them from place to place) and there are many credible car manufacturers an...