Skip to main content

Shokia as Espoo's latest smartphone fails to excite

To put no finer point on it, Nokia messed up the launch of their Windows 8 smartphone. Despite the hardware looking pretty good and incorporating some neat new technology like a blur-free camera and wireless charging, once again marketing bloopers will almost certainly doom the handset to failure. Here's my view on the big 3 reasons they got things so wrong.
  1. The name. Lumia is drab and meaningless.* "iPhone", "Galaxy" and even "One" and "Ascend" are memorable and quotable. If you say you've got a Lumia and especially a "Lumia 920", you'll sound like a dweeb. And no one wants that. Sort it out Nokia. You're not engineers anymore, you're creators of an experience. I don't want a 920 experience, I want a Galaxy of them.
  2. The release date. There isn't one. I've said it before and I'll say it again - Apple would have ended their presentation with "oh, and wait, you can buy this amazing technology tomorrow/ next week/ next month. Pre-orders open now". Any positive feeling around this handset will drain away in the interim and be blown out of the water by the iPhone 5 launch next week.
  3. Carrier support. Nokia and the US carriers put huge money into pushing the Lumia 800. But to no avail - I've seen estimates that the marketing spend per Lumia handset was $1,000 - comfortably more than the purchase price. The lack of clear carrier partners for the 920 is notable. They won't be burnt again and although Apple are certainly a bit of a devil to those vital carriers, they are a profitable devil. iPhone customers spend the most and give the best returns on marketing investments.
I suspect that two further reasons will emerge in the next couple of weeks. Firstly, the Nokia ad campaign that will accompany Lumia 920 will doubtless be rubbish. They desperately need a new creative agency. Secondly, Samsung have already announced their own Windows phone based on the Galaxy range. So Nokia's lock-in on the best operating system in the market will be short-lived. I imagine carriers will be firmly behind Samsung in a way that they won't be behind Nokia.

And, of course, there's the small matter of Apple's forthcoming iPhone 5. We only have to wait until next week.

I'm sad to say it, but I really think that Nokia has messed this up royally and has once again failed to capitalise on excellent hardware and software by failing to learn lessons of previous failures. I had high hopes for the Nokia + Windows 8 combination. That's probably why I'm so annoyed! Let's see what happens.

*Actually, as was pointed out at its original launch, Lumia does mean something. "Prostitute" in Spanish.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Differences between Industrial and Digital businesses

Since I'm stuck on a Eurostar crawling through western France I thought I'd use the downtime to share this table I've made on the differences between Industrial and Digital companies across the main business functions. A strange insight into how my mind works... but hopeful a useful summary!

Strategic lessons from Debenhams

Yesterday’s news cycle brought with it the announcement that Debenhams, a staple of the UK high street, was now in the control of its lenders . This kind of news is sad for the employees of Debenhams and certainly for its shareholders, but it is also a good opportunity for reflection. A business that can trace its history back to 1778 may be about to cease trading forever. For leaders in the retail and associated consumer industries, now is a good time to consider what lessons can be learnt from Debenhams and what could be done to seize the opportunity presented by its passing. I’m thinking about the topic of strategic responses to emerging events at the moment because of the seeming inevitability of a recession this year or next, which will doubtless bring with it many similar situations. Before I get started, a disclaimer. I have no inside knowledge of Debenhams, I have never consulted for them, pitched to them or even met anyone in their management team. This post uses Debenham...

Impacts of a handset leasing model on mobile telcos

Following yesterday's post, here's some related thinking on the impacts on operators of handset leasing. Handset sales represent around 25% of operator revenues in a typical European market, but generate only around 5% of margin. It may therefore be the case that the scenario described would lead operators to a more profitable structural model than exists today. Oil companies are consistently and acceptably profitable, despite being (literally in some cases) the ‘dumb pipe’ that operators are so desperate to avoid becoming. One of the reasons for the oil majors sustained profitability is clear focus on their role in the value chain – to supply the fuel that enables transportation, relying primarily on location, then brand and finally product innovation to compete. BP or Shell do not need to subsidise the purchase of a car in order to drive consumption of fuel because consumers are ‘hooked’ on it (it gets them from place to place) and there are many credible car manufacturers an...