Skip to main content

MWC 2016: Towards distributed personal devices

Mobile World Congress is not typically a place where innovation is overt. The industry comes here to talk shop and make deals, not to imagine a radical future. In the handset market this means taking steps to assure a place in the shrinking ranges of the big buyers, who're generally trying to slim down the range they show customers to improve the customer experience. This means not stepping too far from what customers understand right now. No innovation & no disruption. But there are exceptions.

Sony, for example showed three products that disaggregate the handset to make it more useful. They showed off a tiny earpiece that enables voice and gesture control of the smartphone that it's Bluetooth tethered to. Although still slightly nerdy-looking, it potentially removes the need to constantly pull out a phone or tap a watch.

Even more radical was the companion camera device. This moves the camera phone to a lanyard or shirt clip. Again, a modicum of AI enables the camera to decide when to take a photo (life-blog style) or it can simply be removed and used to snap selfies to our heart's content. It's similar in concept to the Microsoft Sensecam concept that never saw the light of day.
Sony also showed a projector that turns any surface into a touch screen. This piece of the disaggregation puzzle allows entertainment and more complex use cases (booking a holiday, shopping) that are beyond voice control at the moment to be executed without removing the phone from our pockets.

Away from Sony, I met with Coin, a San Francisco startup who have created an HDK and SDK that enable secure NFC payment to be built into any device for a few dollars. Coin therefore vastly extends the number of devices that can provide touch payment so that rather than being restricted to a watch or a phone, many more pieces of kit (e.g. a wearable camera) can act as a payment card.

At the moment all of this technology (except Coin) is concept-only, but I think that it hints at a near future where AI, improved power management and available HDKs for common functions will lead to further evolution of the phone format. Perhaps by MWC 2020 the phone will no longer be the killer mobile tech and we'll all be talking about AI earpieces and personal area networking. We'll see.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Differences between Industrial and Digital businesses

Since I'm stuck on a Eurostar crawling through western France I thought I'd use the downtime to share this table I've made on the differences between Industrial and Digital companies across the main business functions. A strange insight into how my mind works... but hopeful a useful summary!
32 comments
Read more

Strategic lessons from Debenhams

Yesterday’s news cycle brought with it the announcement that Debenhams, a staple of the UK high street, was now in the control of its lenders . This kind of news is sad for the employees of Debenhams and certainly for its shareholders, but it is also a good opportunity for reflection. A business that can trace its history back to 1778 may be about to cease trading forever. For leaders in the retail and associated consumer industries, now is a good time to consider what lessons can be learnt from Debenhams and what could be done to seize the opportunity presented by its passing. I’m thinking about the topic of strategic responses to emerging events at the moment because of the seeming inevitability of a recession this year or next, which will doubtless bring with it many similar situations. Before I get started, a disclaimer. I have no inside knowledge of Debenhams, I have never consulted for them, pitched to them or even met anyone in their management team. This post uses Debenham...
3 comments
Read more

Impacts of a handset leasing model on mobile telcos

Following yesterday's post, here's some related thinking on the impacts on operators of handset leasing. Handset sales represent around 25% of operator revenues in a typical European market, but generate only around 5% of margin. It may therefore be the case that the scenario described would lead operators to a more profitable structural model than exists today. Oil companies are consistently and acceptably profitable, despite being (literally in some cases) the ‘dumb pipe’ that operators are so desperate to avoid becoming. One of the reasons for the oil majors sustained profitability is clear focus on their role in the value chain – to supply the fuel that enables transportation, relying primarily on location, then brand and finally product innovation to compete. BP or Shell do not need to subsidise the purchase of a car in order to drive consumption of fuel because consumers are ‘hooked’ on it (it gets them from place to place) and there are many credible car manufacturers an...
10 comments
Read more