Skip to main content

Digital challenges and responses for telecoms carriers


It's been a while since I've posted. Work is the reason for this: there is lots of it! My assumption as to why this is is that many more organisations are feeling the impact of the broad spectrum disruption that's coming down the line from increasingly established Digital Economy businesses. Great for me, troubling for my clients... 

The disruption is characterised by:
  1. Unequal competition between relatively local, focused, traditional organisations and global, digital-first conglomerates
  2. A rapid move to consumer-centricity from product-centricity as the predominant business model
  3. Uncertainty about how to achieve rapid change from a standing start or even where to begin with a programme of strategic change
I'm coming to believe that mobile telecoms carriers are likely to be the next to suffer reimagination of their industry. Open infrastructure projects, network virtualisation and over-the-top services, combined with zealous regulators suggest that is now conceivable that someone could 'SpaceX' the mobile industry. By this I mean that the cost of infrastructure and spectrum has fallen to a point where a low-billion range investment could create a national network, supported by an operation that would be radically leaner and more delightful than the existing operations of carriers, which have evolved over decades and carrier all of the legacy of that build.

We've put some thought to how carriers can defend themselves in the short term and create a platform for longer term success, based on overcoming three challenges.

Consumers now (sometimes unknowingly) expect more personalisation in their lifecycle with businesses. Mobile operators therefore need to adapt to people’s behaviour on mobile, across their customers’ lifecycle with them, rather than forcing their customers to correspond to their traditional portfolio of services and channels (e.g. through calls or in-store visits).

Increasing personalisation may entail decoupling those people and technologies that touch the customer from the back-office and network technology. This alone represents a transformational challenge.

The other challenge is how to create an environment to innovate and fail faster in order to change their business models and how consumers view them. An industry example of this is AT&T’s Emerging Devices Organization (EDO). Characterized as a ‘start up within the larger organization’, the EDO was formed to quickly identify and create new business models within the broader mobile ecosystem. 

By enabling this kind of culture of innovation, operators will be able to more effectively launch and assess new ventures as well as humanize their brand, which bodes well in this era of personalization.

Importantly, operators must embrace something they know to be true already: they must recognise and optimise their participation in the digital ecosystem. This means understanding that people are increasingly in control of their experiences on mobile and are making choices from an array of providers. Some will want simplicity; others will want to optimize for their particular preferences. To that end, it would be overly simplistic for operators to regard the emergence of OTT services as just a threat. People clearly enjoy using these services and have begun to gradually evolve their behaviors to emphasize their use. Leading operators have already taken steps to benefit from the role of OTTs by using the engaging channels they offer to deepen their relationship with consumers in all parts of the sales and service cycle.

I've written a short report on the above topic, in which I've been lucky enough to get access to behind the scenes data from Facebook and Rogers Communications on how consumers engage with carriers in the above modes. Clearly this is a large topic and the report is the tip of a very deep iceberg... but it's a start and we have more ideas coming!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Impacts of a handset leasing model on mobile telcos

Following yesterday's post, here's some related thinking on the impacts on operators of handset leasing. Handset sales represent around 25% of operator revenues in a typical European market, but generate only around 5% of margin. It may therefore be the case that the scenario described would lead operators to a more profitable structural model than exists today. Oil companies are consistently and acceptably profitable, despite being (literally in some cases) the ‘dumb pipe’ that operators are so desperate to avoid becoming. One of the reasons for the oil majors sustained profitability is clear focus on their role in the value chain – to supply the fuel that enables transportation, relying primarily on location, then brand and finally product innovation to compete. BP or Shell do not need to subsidise the purchase of a car in order to drive consumption of fuel because consumers are ‘hooked’ on it (it gets them from place to place) and there are many credible car manufacturers an

Value drivers for telecoms retail

I've been doing a really large number of driver trees recently - we've taken to using them on every project to get really into the guts of value creation for businesses and thus decide where to focus initiative development (How To Win, if you're keeping score). Anyhow, I had to pause for thought recently to work out how to represent the subscription aspect of telecoms retail for a client. Since it took me a minute, I thought I'd share... its lack of elegance suggests that its not quite right, although it was enough to demonstrate that there was a certain lack of coverage in the initiatives that my client was pursuing and thus spark a debate. Enjoy.

Chief Strategy Officers II - Career Development

Here's a follow up to my earlier post on the starting point of Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) careers in the FTSE 100 and S&P 500 companies - a visualisation of two steps in their careers: their first employer or job and the job they had before they got their current position. Lots of work went into this... so any insights that you glean from the visualisation would be great to hear about :). The CSO is a crucial strategic role on the executive (!) and the owner of the tone and philosophy of decision making across much of the business, knowingly or unknowingly. Scrutiny of their experience in defining the process and language of strategic management is therefore appropriate not just amongst their executive peers, but in my view amongst shareholders. The days when being very smart and able to analyse large amounts of data were enough to be a CSO are basically gone... has the profession moved on enough to cope?