Skip to main content

Valuing platform businesses

A client of mine asked my views on how to value a platform business he is building. Since it's a fun blast from the past (remember when everyone wanted to be a platform?!), I thought I'd share the method we use.
In simple terms, there are two questions you need to answer:
  1. What’s the business model of the platforms that you’re considering rolling up?
  2. Where is value retained in the platform?

Question 1 is a weighting factor, which in combination with Question 2 gives you the standalone value for the platform. There are three predominant platform business models:
  1. Trade, in which the value is in identifying and rendering liquid otherwise underexploited assets
  2. Co-creation, in which the value is in identifying and rendering trustworthy and productivity collaborators who could have otherwise not have found each other
  3. Outcome, in which the platform enables the assembly of data or assets from multiple sources and thus enables the platform owner to monetize the combination by delivering an outcome that would have been otherwise impossible

Each model uses a number of different value mechanisms. A successful platform has all five of them, but will usually excel at only one or two. Success is dependent on the alignment of the mixture of mechanisms with the business model. Value mechanisms build value through:
  1. Participant equity, measured via the absolute and relative number of producers and consumers on the platform
  2. Network equity, measured via the number of connections on the platform, the quality of those connections (e.g. between producers and consumers > consumers and the platform) and the volume of ‘items’ available for purchase relative to the number of participants
  3. Trust equity, measured via the number of positively-rated connections on the platform
  4. Algorithm equity, measured via the success of the platform in creating new connections between participants
  5. Loyalty equity, measured via retention rates and proportion of consumer spend passing through the platform
So the value of the platform is the weighted sum of the equities, each of which carries a dollar value based on their relative competitive position in the market. Simple... if you like math :).
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Differences between Industrial and Digital businesses

Since I'm stuck on a Eurostar crawling through western France I thought I'd use the downtime to share this table I've made on the differences between Industrial and Digital companies across the main business functions. A strange insight into how my mind works... but hopeful a useful summary!
32 comments
Read more

Strategic lessons from Debenhams

Yesterday’s news cycle brought with it the announcement that Debenhams, a staple of the UK high street, was now in the control of its lenders . This kind of news is sad for the employees of Debenhams and certainly for its shareholders, but it is also a good opportunity for reflection. A business that can trace its history back to 1778 may be about to cease trading forever. For leaders in the retail and associated consumer industries, now is a good time to consider what lessons can be learnt from Debenhams and what could be done to seize the opportunity presented by its passing. I’m thinking about the topic of strategic responses to emerging events at the moment because of the seeming inevitability of a recession this year or next, which will doubtless bring with it many similar situations. Before I get started, a disclaimer. I have no inside knowledge of Debenhams, I have never consulted for them, pitched to them or even met anyone in their management team. This post uses Debenham...
3 comments
Read more

Impacts of a handset leasing model on mobile telcos

Following yesterday's post, here's some related thinking on the impacts on operators of handset leasing. Handset sales represent around 25% of operator revenues in a typical European market, but generate only around 5% of margin. It may therefore be the case that the scenario described would lead operators to a more profitable structural model than exists today. Oil companies are consistently and acceptably profitable, despite being (literally in some cases) the ‘dumb pipe’ that operators are so desperate to avoid becoming. One of the reasons for the oil majors sustained profitability is clear focus on their role in the value chain – to supply the fuel that enables transportation, relying primarily on location, then brand and finally product innovation to compete. BP or Shell do not need to subsidise the purchase of a car in order to drive consumption of fuel because consumers are ‘hooked’ on it (it gets them from place to place) and there are many credible car manufacturers an...
10 comments
Read more