Skip to main content

My new book on digital strategy

I have been a little digitally-quiet recently. There have been three reasons for this. First (and most importantly), I have a new son! Second, business remains insanely busy. Third, I've been working on my new book, which was published earlier this month.

What I have tried to do in about 60,000 words was to understand what I've learned in the last ten years of helping large organisations compete and win. That decade represents a period of great change, in that it began with the launch of the first true smart phone and encompasses the aftermath of the Great Crash. The latter damaged the economic models of organisations that had been ticking along for at least a decade. The former provided the basis for rerouting economic value from the damaged legacy organisations into new business models and experiences. In sum, we are left with an environment in which 'free' growth is unavailable and in which we must win in competition with other organisations in order to survive.

In essence the book - The Art and Science of Winning and Losing in a Digital Economy - is a journey that starts with understanding the basis of value creation in 2019's economy, then looks at how individual leaders can make better choices about how to set and realize strategy. In doing so, I've drawn upon a wide range of experiences and the academic theory that helps us break down why what happened, happened.

As with everything I do, there are hundreds of tangents I'd like to explore... sadly that would have led to a sprawling and largely impenetrable tome. I therefore forced myself to be succinct and provide a framework for people to think within and from. Hopefully some of you will find it useful :). 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Impacts of a handset leasing model on mobile telcos

Following yesterday's post, here's some related thinking on the impacts on operators of handset leasing. Handset sales represent around 25% of operator revenues in a typical European market, but generate only around 5% of margin. It may therefore be the case that the scenario described would lead operators to a more profitable structural model than exists today. Oil companies are consistently and acceptably profitable, despite being (literally in some cases) the ‘dumb pipe’ that operators are so desperate to avoid becoming. One of the reasons for the oil majors sustained profitability is clear focus on their role in the value chain – to supply the fuel that enables transportation, relying primarily on location, then brand and finally product innovation to compete. BP or Shell do not need to subsidise the purchase of a car in order to drive consumption of fuel because consumers are ‘hooked’ on it (it gets them from place to place) and there are many credible car manufacturers an

Value drivers for telecoms retail

I've been doing a really large number of driver trees recently - we've taken to using them on every project to get really into the guts of value creation for businesses and thus decide where to focus initiative development (How To Win, if you're keeping score). Anyhow, I had to pause for thought recently to work out how to represent the subscription aspect of telecoms retail for a client. Since it took me a minute, I thought I'd share... its lack of elegance suggests that its not quite right, although it was enough to demonstrate that there was a certain lack of coverage in the initiatives that my client was pursuing and thus spark a debate. Enjoy.

Chief Strategy Officers II - Career Development

Here's a follow up to my earlier post on the starting point of Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) careers in the FTSE 100 and S&P 500 companies - a visualisation of two steps in their careers: their first employer or job and the job they had before they got their current position. Lots of work went into this... so any insights that you glean from the visualisation would be great to hear about :). The CSO is a crucial strategic role on the executive (!) and the owner of the tone and philosophy of decision making across much of the business, knowingly or unknowingly. Scrutiny of their experience in defining the process and language of strategic management is therefore appropriate not just amongst their executive peers, but in my view amongst shareholders. The days when being very smart and able to analyse large amounts of data were enough to be a CSO are basically gone... has the profession moved on enough to cope?