Skip to main content

Executive Teams - what I've learned from the S&P 500's A Team

When I published my first post on the current and future structure of Executive Leadership Teams (ExCos) I promised that I was in the process of extending the data set to encompass the S&P 500 as well as the FTSE 100. As you can imagine, this is a mammoth undertaking given that my time is restricted to evenings (when not looking after my son), weekends (ditto), the commute and snatched sidebar conversations with colleagues. Nonetheless I am making some progress in my analysis... my data gathering for all companies beginning with 'A' on the S&P 500 are now complete. Rather than wait for all letters to be completed, I thought I'd throw out a few findings and see what you all think of them. So, in no particular order:
  • I was able to look at 63 organisations, although 3 of them declined to publish details of their leadership structure and I was unable to get the information from within my network. One of these, incidentally, is Alphabet...
  • In the 'A's, the average ExCo size is bigger than in the FTSE 100 (11 plays 10)...
  • ...and there is often a very large extended leadership team that in several cases pushed out beyond 20 people
  • The S&P 500 'A's' have a subtly different make-up in terms of seats:
    • COO
    • CHRO
    • A Geographic Market Leader
    • 2 3 Market Vertical Leaders
    • CIO or Chief Digital Officer
    • General Counsel
    • CSO
    • Chief Marketing Officer
  • More than a quarter of organisations did have a Chief Strategy Officer, so the role is still important to some. Marketing is, however, a little better represented thus far
A couple of things that entertained me:
  • I found one spelling mistake:

  • One organization in retail decided to include 'customer satisfaction' in the job title of every executive to emphasise how important customer satisfaction is... the exception being the CHRO, who apparently doesn't need to concern himself with customers... 
  • The most confusing job title I found was: Chairman, EMEA, Commercial Risk Solutions, Head of Mergers & Acquisitions, EMEA, Commercial Risk Solutions, CEO, MENA, Commercial Risk Solutions. What is this person's skillset and how do they choose where to spend their time?
  • One company has both a Chief Design Officer and a CAIO (and it's Apple)
  • Four companies declined to list their executives and I was unable to find a definitive list of them... and one of those is Alphabet... so much for transparency
Anyhow, my analysis continues. Hope you found that update useful!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Impacts of a handset leasing model on mobile telcos

Following yesterday's post, here's some related thinking on the impacts on operators of handset leasing. Handset sales represent around 25% of operator revenues in a typical European market, but generate only around 5% of margin. It may therefore be the case that the scenario described would lead operators to a more profitable structural model than exists today. Oil companies are consistently and acceptably profitable, despite being (literally in some cases) the ‘dumb pipe’ that operators are so desperate to avoid becoming. One of the reasons for the oil majors sustained profitability is clear focus on their role in the value chain – to supply the fuel that enables transportation, relying primarily on location, then brand and finally product innovation to compete. BP or Shell do not need to subsidise the purchase of a car in order to drive consumption of fuel because consumers are ‘hooked’ on it (it gets them from place to place) and there are many credible car manufacturers an...

Differences between Industrial and Digital businesses

Since I'm stuck on a Eurostar crawling through western France I thought I'd use the downtime to share this table I've made on the differences between Industrial and Digital companies across the main business functions. A strange insight into how my mind works... but hopeful a useful summary!

Value drivers for telecoms retail

I've been doing a really large number of driver trees recently - we've taken to using them on every project to get really into the guts of value creation for businesses and thus decide where to focus initiative development (How To Win, if you're keeping score). Anyhow, I had to pause for thought recently to work out how to represent the subscription aspect of telecoms retail for a client. Since it took me a minute, I thought I'd share... its lack of elegance suggests that its not quite right, although it was enough to demonstrate that there was a certain lack of coverage in the initiatives that my client was pursuing and thus spark a debate. Enjoy.