Skip to main content

Impressions from NAB: 4K cameras, workflows and screens

Only at NAB will you hear a senior representative of a global technology company reply to a slight on the efficacy of his production workflow with the phrase “Well, Stallone’s using it on his new movie”. This exchange on Canon’s stand regarding their new EOS C500 movie camera was one of the more entertaining moments in what was otherwise a relatively subdued first day at the National Association of Broadcasters annual conference in Las Vegas.

Canon’s new camera is a part of a major trend emerging at this year’s NAB, namely 4K – the successor to HD. In simple terms, 4K has roughly double the resolution of today’s HD – 3840x2160 pixels plays 1,920 x 1,080. What this means in real terms is stunning, photo realistic visuals on big TV panels, the largest of which are now so big that HD looks grainy.

All three major camera makers – Sony, Panasonic and Canon - launched 4K units this year. Not being a cameraman they all seemed much the same; however market disruptor Red seemed to have attracted the most attention, with queues round the block to see its new Red Dragon CCD and lens system. Tellingly, it’s priced at a bargain $6k, vastly cheaper than mainstream rivals. The movie camera market is going away from the traditional players as fast as post-production technology.

Once it’s captured, a further production issue with 4K is in processing. Because the files are so big, more horsepower is required for craft editing processes. I asked a number of asset management systems vendors, Intel and IBM about their roadmaps in this area and was met with telling silence. Only Japan’s NTT appeared to have thought about the problem and were demoing a set of rack-mounted processors to run 4K workflows.

Finally, there’s the consumption devices themselves. Sony demonstrated a prototype 46” LCD that offered both 4K and an impressive glasses-free 3D capability. I spoke to one of its engineering minders, who pointed out that in order to provide the latter functionality – which he thought would be readily available in Japan this year – you require a panel that can do 4K anyway.

I can definitely see consumer devices becoming available this year. Whether there are any sources is another matter. High capacity BluRay was mentioned as one possibility. Satellite also offers the bandwidth to get it into homes, however set top boxes would need to be refreshed and there’d need to be enough sets to make it economically viable. I’m not sure that 3D is today, which may well suppress broadcasters’ desire to offer it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Impacts of a handset leasing model on mobile telcos

Following yesterday's post, here's some related thinking on the impacts on operators of handset leasing. Handset sales represent around 25% of operator revenues in a typical European market, but generate only around 5% of margin. It may therefore be the case that the scenario described would lead operators to a more profitable structural model than exists today. Oil companies are consistently and acceptably profitable, despite being (literally in some cases) the ‘dumb pipe’ that operators are so desperate to avoid becoming. One of the reasons for the oil majors sustained profitability is clear focus on their role in the value chain – to supply the fuel that enables transportation, relying primarily on location, then brand and finally product innovation to compete. BP or Shell do not need to subsidise the purchase of a car in order to drive consumption of fuel because consumers are ‘hooked’ on it (it gets them from place to place) and there are many credible car manufacturers an...

Differences between Industrial and Digital businesses

Since I'm stuck on a Eurostar crawling through western France I thought I'd use the downtime to share this table I've made on the differences between Industrial and Digital companies across the main business functions. A strange insight into how my mind works... but hopeful a useful summary!

Value drivers for telecoms retail

I've been doing a really large number of driver trees recently - we've taken to using them on every project to get really into the guts of value creation for businesses and thus decide where to focus initiative development (How To Win, if you're keeping score). Anyhow, I had to pause for thought recently to work out how to represent the subscription aspect of telecoms retail for a client. Since it took me a minute, I thought I'd share... its lack of elegance suggests that its not quite right, although it was enough to demonstrate that there was a certain lack of coverage in the initiatives that my client was pursuing and thus spark a debate. Enjoy.