Skip to main content

Smaller African telecoms groups as acquisition targets

Following my previous analysis on the attractiveness of buying and selling telecoms incumbents, this post looks at smaller African telecoms groups and their potential for acquisition by the larger players in the market.

I classify African telecoms players into 4 tiers:
  • Tier 1 are the largest international and regional players, each with over 50Mn African customers. There are four companies in this category: France Telecom, MTN, Vodafone (including its majority-owned subsidiaries Vodacom and Safaricom) and Bharti Airtel. The Tier 1’s have huge financial clout and have are aggressively acquisitive.
  • Tier 2 are smaller international players with significant African investments or large regional players with presence in a few locations. Maroc Telecom, Etisalat and Vimpelcom are the most notable examples of these entities.
  • Tier 3 are regional groups, sometimes owned outside the continent by small investors. Globacom, Comium, LAP Green, Millicom, Telkom South Africa and Lintel fall into this category
  • Tier 4 are independent or largely independent operators, sometimes former or current incumbents. There are some large companies in this category – Cell C in South Africa, ETC in Ethiopia and Econet in Zimbabwe being nice examples

Until 2009 there was a different name in the top tier – Zain, a group that operated in 16 African countries and was acquired by Bharti for $10.7Bn. There is a good deal of sentiment amongst observers that I’ve talked to that Bharti significantly overpaid for the asset, which was itself a mish-mash of organically grown and inorganically acquired operators. Whether it was a good, bad or indifferent idea, Zain was the last really big deal done on the African continent.
 
Another super-deal is an unlikely route to growth as only MTN is a conceivable target and its market capitalisation makes it unwieldy for anyone outside of the top couple of global operators. The Tier 3 and 4 operators are much more realistic targets, particularly the five small groups that collectively provide service to about 50 million African mobile users. The figure below shows my valuation estimates for the five.


Of these operators, I’m personally most interested in the top 3 – Comium and Lintel are both owned by Middle Eastern investors and are part of larger investment portfolios. Running through the three, Globacom looks attractive because of its focus on the large Nigerian market – although it has another four country operations, they are small and probably easy to integrate or divest. Millicom is the asset that looks most like Zain – it has about 10 country operations and tends to be a top-3 operator in each. Finally and probably most likely to be up for sale in the near future, LAP Green has some great positions in markets like Zambia and Niger, where there is comparatively little competition. As its owned by a Libyan Government investment vehicle, it’s possible that it might be realistic to expect that country’s new government will seek to capitalise on the asset in order to fund reconstruction.

Looking at the players and their operations, it seems to me that the most obvious buyer for LAP Green is Vodafone. The other operators – MTN in particular – have too many overlapping operations. Given the state of regulation and competition law in much of Africa, that merger would be painful. My gut feel, however, is that Vodafone and its subsidiaries would find the likely complex nature of LAP’s ownership unpalatable. More likely suitors for them are probably from the Middle East. Etisalat is a strong possibility as the asset would give it a big jump in market share.

Focussing specifically on MTN, since they’ve been the most vocal about expansion this year, if I were a betting man (which I’m not), my top 5 likely targets for them would be:
  • mCel in Mozambique, although that carries with it the prospect of taking on the TDM fixed line business
  • Econet or Telecel in Zimbabwe, provided they could get past governmental desires to keep players locally owned
  • Onatel in Burkino Faso
  • Gabon Telecom - I suspect Vodafone would be a strong competitor for that operation if it became available as the asset looks a lot like Telecom Ghana
  • Whatever’s left of Libyana and Al-Madar in Libya – unlikely to happen in the next year because of the chaos in that country and likely to be contested by Maroc Telecom
Additionally, it’ll doubtless keep buying up GSM licenses to expand its footprint, as it has recently done in Benin and Ivory Coast.

I’ve wittered on about this for long enough. I’ll keep watching developments and see how right I am!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Impacts of a handset leasing model on mobile telcos

Following yesterday's post, here's some related thinking on the impacts on operators of handset leasing. Handset sales represent around 25% of operator revenues in a typical European market, but generate only around 5% of margin. It may therefore be the case that the scenario described would lead operators to a more profitable structural model than exists today. Oil companies are consistently and acceptably profitable, despite being (literally in some cases) the ‘dumb pipe’ that operators are so desperate to avoid becoming. One of the reasons for the oil majors sustained profitability is clear focus on their role in the value chain – to supply the fuel that enables transportation, relying primarily on location, then brand and finally product innovation to compete. BP or Shell do not need to subsidise the purchase of a car in order to drive consumption of fuel because consumers are ‘hooked’ on it (it gets them from place to place) and there are many credible car manufacturers an...

Differences between Industrial and Digital businesses

Since I'm stuck on a Eurostar crawling through western France I thought I'd use the downtime to share this table I've made on the differences between Industrial and Digital companies across the main business functions. A strange insight into how my mind works... but hopeful a useful summary!

Value drivers for telecoms retail

I've been doing a really large number of driver trees recently - we've taken to using them on every project to get really into the guts of value creation for businesses and thus decide where to focus initiative development (How To Win, if you're keeping score). Anyhow, I had to pause for thought recently to work out how to represent the subscription aspect of telecoms retail for a client. Since it took me a minute, I thought I'd share... its lack of elegance suggests that its not quite right, although it was enough to demonstrate that there was a certain lack of coverage in the initiatives that my client was pursuing and thus spark a debate. Enjoy.